g., geographical part, dimensions out of MA, aspect away from math show, sex, level peak, and guide seasons), i used the new heterogeneity sample. The fresh new Q decide to try (heterogeneity try) discovered the distinctions among effect models, for this reason to explore hence possible moderator (i.elizabeth., investigation have) may have starred a job in these variations try called for.
Geographical Region
Geographic nations was considered a potential reasonable factor. The outcome sizes had been labeled to your four large communities: All of us, Europe, Asia or any other areas. New mathematical heterogeneity among effect products are revealed (Q = , p = 0.01). Especially, the research having Far-eastern samples encountered the prominent impact dimensions (r = ?0.41), as the knowledge with Western european products demonstrated the tiniest feeling size (r = ?0.21). Additionally, the research with our team examples got a larger impact dimensions (r = ?0.30) than the corresponding classification during the Europe, as they got a smaller sized impression proportions as compared to related category inside Asia.
Sex
The fresh modest analyses on sex had been used due to two tips. Earliest, the class with this changeable is actually in keeping with Ma’s (1999) studies, and we opposed if the math anxiety-performance link are notably different certainly one of three groups (men, lady, and you can mixed); the results suggested there have been zero differences among the three classes (Q = cuatro.62, p = 0.099). Next, this study tended to stretch subsequent to evaluate when you should ban the newest mistake perception from the combined class and you will whether the average correlations between female and male was somewhat different. Only eight knowledge you to definitely given the fresh new relationship ranging from MA and you can mathematics overall performance or necessary information would-be transferred to feeling versions to own more genders was basically integrated. The results ideal no factor anywhere between female (roentgen = ?0.30) and boys (r = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).
Degrees Peak
Five levels-height teams was shaped within this meta-studies, in addition to a standard class, junior high classification, elder higher category, blend classification, and college category. The outcomes ideal this variable had high consequences for the mathematics anxiety-efficiency connect (Q = , p = 0.02). So much more particularly, the fresh senior higher group encountered the premier math nervousness-show hook (r = ?0.44), with the latest junior higher class (roentgen = ?0.39), school (roentgen = ?0.33), primary (r = ?0.27), and you will combined class, which had the tiniest math stress-performance hook up (roentgen = ?0.21).
Publication Many years
The modern meta-research consisted of the time frame away from 19 years (2000–2018). To evaluate if or not date got an impact on new math stress-show hook, a great Pearson correlation try presented within book decades together with of all the personal knowledge (roentgen = 0.twenty seven, p > 0.05). No correlation is discovered between effect brands plus the book years (Figure cuatro).
Aspect away from MA
We in addition to looked whether the balances used to test math anxiety had an impact on the fresh math anxiety-performance link. The results ideal your dimensions off MA didn’t come with impact to the mathematics anxiety-abilities hook up (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Specifically, private training that used almost every other bills (elizabeth.grams., the new Math Stress Level getting Basic University Students [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] had the biggest mathematics nervousness-abilities hook (r = ?0.41), accompanied by degree which used the fresh new MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (r = ?0.35), MAQ (r = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (r = ?0 
.24), SEMA (roentgen = ?0.24), and you will AMAS (r = ?0.24), and you may individual studies that used brand new MASC encountered the littlest math anxiety-overall performance connect (roentgen = ?0.15).
Measurement regarding Mathematics Performance
The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).
ความเห็นล่าสุด